South Africa: Constitutional Assembly Resources
You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: Constitutional Assembly Resources >> 1996 >> [1996] ZAConAsmRes 62 | Noteup | LawCiteRe: Objection to the Certification of the New Constitution by the Constitutional Court [1996] ZAConAsmRes 62 (31 May 1996)
UNITED CHRISTIAN ACTION
UCA objects to omission of the sub-section: "In submission to Almighty God" from the preamble to the Constitution in light of the above Constitutional Principle. Over 20 000 people personally petitioned the Constitutional Assembly on 30 May 1995 to acknowledge Almighty God in the constitution, 10 000 people in Cape Town on 3 May 1996 marched to Parliament to call for sumission to God to be written into the Constitution. Over 230 000 people have signed the "Christianity and Religious Freedom" document which stated in point 3: "We require that those who will formulate the new laws of the land will acknowledge the Triune God in the Constitution of our country." There has been no similar expression of mass support for the removal of God from the Constitution. If this government is truly democratic, it will listen to the voice of the people as evidenced above. UCA therefore recommend that "In humble submission to Almight God" be included in the Preamble of the New Constitution.
This conflicts with Section 9: Equality (5) "Discrimination on one or more of the grounds listed in subsection (3) is unfair unless it is established that the discrimination is fair." In section 9 the person accused of discrimination is guilty until he proves his innocence. This is against the principles of all civilised law where one is innocent until proven guilty. We recomment that this sub-section be removed.
This is true until those decisions concerning reproduction affect another life, that of the unborn living inside of the mother, co-existing with the mother, but not part of the mother's body. This section could imply that the mother has the sole right to decide to abort/kill her unborn baby. This conflicts with Constitutional Principle II "Everyone shall enjoy all universally accepted fundamental rights, freedoms and civil liberties ..." Surely the most fundamental right of all is life. And the unborn baby should enjoy the legal protection of that right. And it conflicts with Constitutional Principle III "The Constitution shall prohibit... all other forms of discrimination...". With abortion the baby suffers a fatal form of discrimination on the basis of his age. It also conflicts with Constitutional Principle I: "...a democratic system of government..." To have unlimited right to make decisions concerning your reproduction where it also affects the life of another human being, violates the rights of other citizens to continue to enjoy their life (the unborn baby). Also in all the latest surveys, South Africans have overwhelmingly opposed abortion on demand and if the government proceeds with the proposed legislation they will have shown themselves to be undemocratic. Constitutional Principle V ensures the: "...equality of all before the law", surely this includes all South Africans, irrespective of their age development or geographical situation.? We recommend that the unborn baby receive constitutional protection by the addition of the clause, "irrespective of their degrees of awareness, health or development", into Section 10 of the New Constitution so that it reads "Everyone, irrespective of their degrees of awareness, health or development, has the right to life."
UCA objects to the omission from Section 12 of the following sub-section. "All law abiding citizens have the right to obtain, own, carry and use licensed firearms to defend life, liberty and property and to prevent violent crime. The right of self defence shall not be infringed upon." We recommend that the above sub-section be included in the Constitution to ensure the right of law abiding citizens to continue to enjoy the fundamental rights, freedoms and civil liberties as mentioned in Principle II. We recognise that it is impossible for the police force to guarantee the safety of every citizen so no hindrances should be placed upon the right of law abiding citizens to obtain and use firearms for self defence.
UCA objects to the omission of the following sub-section in Section 16 (2) needed in order to protect women against the gender discrimination mentioned above. Section 16 (2) should read: "The right in subsection (1) does not extend to -"(d) obscene or pornographic expressions; defamatory, blasphemous or profane expressions." We recommend that the above sub-section be included in the Constitution.
We therefore recommend that the new Constitution must be amended to include a right on the protection of the family and of marriage.
UNITED CHRISTIAN ACTION |