South Africa: Constitutional Assembly Resources Support SAFLII

You are here:  SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: Constitutional Assembly Resources >> 1995 >> [1995] ZAConAsmRes 19

| Noteup | LawCite

A Submission to the Constitutional Assembly on the Nature of the Provincial System and Local Government (Theme Committee 111) [1995] ZAConAsmRes 19 (5 January 1995)

 

5 January 1995

A SUBMISSION to the CONSTITUTIONAL ASSEMBLY on the NATURE of the PROVINCIAL SYSTEM and LOCAL GOVERNMENT (Theme Committee 111)

Thank you for your notice requesting submissions concerning the New Constitution. We comment specifically on:

1.The issues around the development of Primary Local Authorities in Rural Areas; and

2. Representation in the Rural District Council System

The issue of access for farm workers to local government is critical since:

* this is where resources are situated, allocated and distributed;

* political decisions are made and implemented here;

* the RDP needs democratic local government for rural development;

* at least three million farm workers and their families are resident on more than 60 000 farms nationally. These citizens are not always considered in rural local government debates; and

* farm workers are not always resident within municipal boundaries - the franchise at a local level is thus not always ensured for millions of farm dwellers.

The Centre For Rural Legal Studies is an independent policy formulation body with extensive experience and contact with grassroots organisations across the political spectrum. We place ourselves between activist organisations and the state. The Centre has been central to advocating for the inclusion of farm dwellers at a local government level. Our comments are based on extensive field work. (See Appendices for details of presentations and research.)

Summary of Proposals

  1. Rural Primary Local Authorities (RPLAS)

The lack of rural institutions favourable to farm workers requires serious attention if local democracy is to prove effective at articulating farm worker needs and minimising marginalisation.
The position of the farm dweller (and especially the farm worker) is weakened by a general lack of rural civil society. Churches, advice offices, political parties, trade unions, rural networks, and civics are scattered all over the platteland, but they suffer from limited capacity and skills. And very few organisations are active on farms ‑their operations are generally confined to the town.
The organisations which do exist on farms are usually controlled by the farmer, are dependant on his/her goodwill and tolerance, or are geared towards the farmers needs. Institutions traditionally associated with supporting white commercial farmers (eg. commercial cooperatives, the South African Agricultural Union, Rural Foundation) are most active in securing forms of representation at local level.
For Example: The Stellenbosch Farmers Association has been instrumental in setting up rural local government negotiating forums. The farmers and managers make up the statutory component, whilst farm workers make up the non-statutory component. It is obvious during fieldwork that the interest of farm workers are subsumed to the interests of farm owners.
For Example: The Robertson Community Development Association (affiliated to the Rural Foundation) has representation as part of the statutory component in the Transitional Council. Unfortunately, the vocalisation of farm workers interest is left to farmers.
Alliances between farm workers and farmers in securing access to local government is viable if it is linked to institutional and individual development, especially for farm workers. The linking of RDP budgets to local government means that without forms of interest representation, farm dwellers may find themselves marginal, this time to the reconstruction and development process.

An affirmative move is Central State Support for constituents who have been
denied access to political rights, education and other forms of confidence
building in the apartheid era. The Creation of a Farm Worker Office must be
stipulated in the New Constitution


Summary of Recommendation on RPLAs:
While the establishment of RPLAs is necessary for the formation of democratic local government, it must be accompanied by serious support mechanisms and programmes. Given that institutional weakness is endemic in rural areas the phasing‑in of suitable home-grown structures which have minimal potential for conflict must be part of the overall model for effective rural local government. The development of an affirmative action programme aimed specifically at farm workers is important in this regard.

· Mixed Representation in the Rural District Council (RDC)
There should be a phasing in from direct to indirect representation. In the transitional period, direct representation occurs as there are few rural structures. Once RPLAs have been established, they can nominate representatives to the RDC. Therefore, in the period leading up to election in 1995, rural candidates can be nominated to the RDC. It will be the role of support institutions to assist with mobilisation.
Diagram One illustrates the two forms of elected representation and the make-up of the RDC:

1, One is the indirect method where the urban transitional local Council as a body elects a number of representatives.

3
2. The other is the direct method where individuals in the Rural Wards elect representatives to the RDC.
Diagram Two illustrates the composition of the Rural Primary Local Authority. What is important here is representation, and the articulation of needs. Without this, the RDP will not reach farm dwellers, least of all those most in need of state assistance. Within the rural ward representatives are elected who will then take local concerns to the Rural District Council.
Diagram Three suggests that each rural ward agree on representatives. Once representatives have been elected, they constitute the Rural Primary Local Authority. In the 1995 elections direct representation to the RDC may be the best way forward until rural institutions are viable. With the introduction of the New Constitution later, there should already have been progress with primary local authority capacity.

We hope this submission makes some contribution to the formulation of an inclusive and democratic New Constitution. Should you require verbal or additional motivation, please do not hesitate to contact us at Tel. (021) 883 8036, or Fax. (021) 886 5076.


For the Centre For Rural Legal Studies,
Terence Fife (Researcher).