South Africa: Constitutional Assembly Resources Support SAFLII

You are here:  SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: Constitutional Assembly Resources >> 1995 >> [1995] ZAConAsmRes 1332

| Noteup | LawCite

Official Languages [1995] ZAConAsmRes 1332 (19 May 1995)

 

19 May 1995

OFFICIAL LANGUAGE/S

I write in answer to your open invitation to comment upon the present arrangement which provides for ELEVEN official languages.

The issue should not be decided on a majority vote but in practice it is unlikely that this could happen as no one language would gain an absolute majority over the other ten! Regard must be given to the international situation and the easiest manner in which our country can keep in touch with other nations.

Other countries must have encountered a similar problem but I do not have much information thereon. India with its huge population may give guidance although it is really comparable to Europe because it is also home for different nations with their own languages.

Both India and the European Union appear to have adopted 'English' as a communication medium. Recently an Indian cricket team toured South Africa. Its members came from different areas and few could understand what the other members were saying. So the language of communication in the team was English.

English has international recognition as a medium of communication and it does happen to be one of the languages at present afforded official recognition in our country.

Already there is large de facto acceptance of English in South Africa.

I do not suggest one can only choose English and ignore recognition in defined areas of other tongues e.g. Northern Kwa-Zulu and other rural areas. Afrikaans cannot be overlooked and it is spoken by others apart from 'Afrikaners'.

The strain on people and Government and the expense of having to maintain ELEVEN languages is impractical.

Any decision will have to be a compromise. Perhaps the following can be
considered:
- make English the 'official' medium of communication
- but allow for at least one alternative at all times
e.g. Afrikaans ( as there is no Afrikaner homeland area
- OR one of the other 9 current languages, depending upon the area concerned e.g. Kwa-Zulu, Venda etc.

In this way no language spoken by any significant number of people will be overlooked.

It is not practicable to select only one alternative language per province e.g. what would be the choice for Gauteng ?

L. STARFIELD