South Africa: Constitutional Assembly Resources Support SAFLII

You are here:  SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: Constitutional Assembly Resources >> 1994 >> [1994] ZAConAsmRes 87

| Noteup | LawCite

Re: Committee Iv: an Entrenched Bill of Rights [1994] ZAConAsmRes 87 (28 December 1994)

 

28 December 1994

Dear Sirs

RE: COMMITTEE IV: AN ENTRENCHED BILL OF RIGHTS

Thank you for your invitation to make submissions regarding the new Constitution.

The member organisations of United Christian Action believe that freedom has to be based upon and in accordance with the 1 0 Commandments. Adherence to the 10 Commandments would ensure true religious freedom - freedom to worship and serve the one true God - the Creator and Sovereign Lord of the Universe - the only source of freedom. And it would protect worship, speech, time, families, life, love, property, truth, reputation and conscience (Exodus 20:3-17).

We also hold that it is not acceptable to justify evil in the name of freedom. There should be no freedom for cruelty to animals, perversion, blasphemy, rape and child abuse (such as occur in Satanism) in any civilised country. Nor can the murder of human life in the womb (abortion) or the exploitation of women's bodies for profit (pornography) be tolerated.


True religious freedom must include freedom for parents to educate their children according to their religious convictions - whether through state schools, independent Christian schools or home schooling.

Religious freedom must include the freedom to proclaim the God of the Bible to be the only true and living God, and to objectively point out the errors in other religions Any attempt by the state to register or regulate churches, missions or Christian organisations would be an intolerable breach of religious freedom. The proposals to establish a Department of Religious Affairs must therefore be rejected as unacceptable interference by the state in religious matters and a step towards state control of the church. We also hold that true freedom comes from within. The foundation of a truly free nation can only be laid in characters, minds and lives changed by the Grace of God and built upon the Word of God.

We accordingly recommend that the Bill of Rights clearly protect freedom of worship, freedom of speech, freedom for parents to educate their children according to their religious convictions, the right to life of unborn babies, the protection of women from the exploitation of pornography, the right to property, the right to freedom of the press, and freedom of movement and association.

Thank you for your time and consideration. Should you require, we will be available to present documentation in support of our position.

Yours sincerely

Rev Peter Hammond

Director



28 December 1994

Dear Sirs


RE: FINANCIAL AND FISCAL COMMISSION

Thank you for your invitation to make submissions with regard to the new Constitution.

The member organisations of United Christian Action support a free market economy based on the private ownership of property, and individual free enterprise. We maintain that any taxation of 1 0% or higher is oppressive, and only leads to wastage and corruption. We further hold to the Biblical principle that property and inheritance may not be taxed. Furthermore, those institutions and individuals involved in full-time religious service should not be taxed. Their support is provided by the spontaneous free will giving of people who have already been taxed.

We also hold to the Biblical principle that unjust weights (unbacked currency) and measures (inflation) is a hidden tax. Throughout the Bible, money is spoken of by weight. God's law requires that financial transactions be made in terms of honest measures. Inflation is the theft of wages and the destruction of savings by devaluing the currency. This is the result of counterfeiting - printing more "money" than there is gold to back it. It is essential dishonesty - a hidden tax - where "silver has become dross". The devastating impact of unbacked currency/inflation on pensions and savings - is criminal. Biblical Law requires that we use honest scales and honest weights; in other words, honest money backed by real constant value.

The members of United Christian Action hold to the "KwaSizabantu Affirmation" which declares: "We affirm that the Bible is clearly against oppression of the poor by the rich. It is also very clear about the right to own land and property: 'You shall not covet your neighbour's house; you shall not covet your neighbour's wife ... nor his ox, nor his donkey, nor anything that is your neighbour's"'. (Exodus 20:17); "While the land remained, was it not your own?" (Acts 5:4); (Matthew 20:15).

Based on the commandments "Thou shalt not steal" and "Thou shalt not covet”, we reject any form of nationalisation and forced redistribution of wealth and land. It is an observable fact that wherever this Biblical Law has been violated, as in Socialist countries, the result has been starvation, wastage and death of millions."

Thank you for your time and consideration. Should you require us to present documentation in support of our position, we would be glad to do so.


Yours sincerely




Rev Peter Hammond
Director





28 December 1994

Dear Sirs


RE: COMMITTEE 1: DEMOCRACY CHARACTER OF STATE

Thank you for your invitation to make submissions regarding the new Constitution.

The member organisations of United Christian Action strongly recommend that the new Constitution provides for a constitutionally lirnited Republic - where law rules. We recognise that civil government needs to be powerful enough to restrain the evil impulses of criminals. However, believing that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely, we hold that rulers cannot be trusted with absolute power either. We maintain that the solution is not the pagan/Greek utopia of democracy - where man rules - but a constitutional Republic - where law rules.

We hold that society should be rebuilt upon the unchangeable law of God's Word - the Bible. Instead of rulers, we need to elect servants ‑civil servants - bound down with the chains of the Constitution. And in keeping with the American and Swiss systems, we recommend a !system of checks and balances to divide the power and responsibility into a Trinitarian model of executive, legislative and judicial branches of civil government.

We would hold to a bicameral national legislature, where one house is composed of representatives elected by the people. And a second house which is composed of senators representing each province. We would support an executive officer directly elected by the people and not by the ruling party. A written Constitution based upon the principles of the Word of God is essential. This Constitution must clearly define and restrict the power of government. The main purpose of a Constitution should be as a restriction to prevent rulers from abusing power.


We would recommend a federal system where most responsibilities

and powers rest on the local and provincial governments with only minimal powers delegated to the central government (including: National Defence and Foreign Policy).

We would recommend a Constitution which protects the rights for a free-market economy, based upon the private ownership of property and individual free enterprise. In order to prevent corruption, wastage and the abuse of power, we would recommend that the Constitution expressly limits the taxation powers of central government to less than 10% of the total earnings of the citizens. Furthermore, any taxation of property or of inheritance needs to be strictly forbidden. Those institutions and individuals involved in the full-time religious service should not be taxed. There should also be no taxation on Bibles.

The education system needs to be controlled by the parents and aided by the church, but independent of the state. One cannot entrust the state with the moulding of the minds of future voters. The control of education should be in the hands of parents and the content of education must be moral, character developing and Bible-based.

We believe that a decentralised constitutionally limited state with separation of powers and checks and balances would be the best system to meet the needs of South Africa.

Thank you for your time and consideration. We would appreciate any opportunity to present documentation in support of our position.


Yours sincerely




Rev Peter Hammond
Director