South Africa: Constitutional Assembly Resources Support SAFLII

You are here:  SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: Constitutional Assembly Resources >> 1994 >> [1994] ZAConAsmRes 74

| Noteup | LawCite

Submission: Theme Committee V [1994] ZAConAsmRes 74 (23 December 1994)

 

23 December 1994
To whom it may concern

SUBMISSION: THEME COMMITTEE V

I note that the above theme committee does not specifically cover the relationship between the individual citizen and the judiciary/legal state-apparatus. I firmly believe that certain principles must be entrenched in the Constitution to prevent miscarriages of justice that are allowed under the present system:

  1. The legal system must be made "user friendly". In South Africa, only an elite is currently able to afford to employ lawyers, It is presently unforgivable that no help is given to people who must undertake their own defence (an office located in the same building as the Magistrates and Supreme Court that employedlofficials who helped explain the legal procedure would be a start). It is presently impossible that an illiterate person can fully understand the contents of a Summons or a Plea. Our civil courts have become an ideal arena for the wealthy to sue others with,, confidence, simply because they are aware that the costs of representation for the defendant are prohibitive. This situation must change. Financial aid would be ideal, but perhaps too costly.
  1. Once judgement has been passed against a defendant who failed! to file an intention to defend, the costs of having the judgement overturned are prohibitive. An alternative system that takes the financial situation of most defendants into account must be devised.
  2. When an individual has a civil judgement passed against ]tier, name, this judgement remains for five years after the debt has been paid. There should be an inexpensive method of having judgements cleared immediately after they have been paid. Punishing the individual for a further five years (by making it difficult to obtain loans, etc.) serves no purpose whatsoever. The credit-rating industry should tall under the jurisdiction of the courts, particularly with regard to having an individuals rating reviewed~iby an independent authority.


A legal system that fails to offer aid to the disadvantaged) members of society cannot be tolerated in a country that purports to respect human rights.



Basil Lawrence