Court Roll: KwaZulu-Natal High Court (Durban)
You are here:
SAFLII >>
Databases >>
Court Roll: KwaZulu-Natal High Court (Durban) >>
2021 >>
[2021] ZAKZDHCRolls 107
| Noteup
| LawCite
KwaZulu-Natal High Court Roll (Durban) (6 August 2021)
Download original files |
PDF format
RTF formatIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
KWAZULU-NATAL LOCAL DIVISION, DURBAN
COMMENCING AT DURBAN ON FRIDAY, 06th AUGUST 2021
TO BE HEARD BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE LOPES
EMAIL ADDRESS: HDube@judiciary.org.za (Hlengiwe)
Landline: 031 362 5829
|
1.
|
D1350/21 |
N NOOMÉ & ANO vs VJ NOOMÉ |
URGENT APP |
|
2.
|
D6487/20 |
THE STD BANK OF SA LTD vs T MAZWI |
APPLICATION FOR PROP EXECUTABLE |
|
3.
|
D7013/20 |
NEDBANK LTD vs SKUTHELE BUILDING PROJECTS CC & ANO |
DEFAULT JUDGMENT FOR PROP EXECUTABLE |
|
4.
|
D8410/20 |
EXP: NATIONAL DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS |
APPLICATIONS |
|
5.
|
D4575/21 |
EN NCUBE vs N MKHIZE N.O. & ORS |
APPLICATIONS |
|
6.
|
D4482/21 |
OMTHIYA CONSULTING (PTY)LTD vs THE BODY CORPORATE OF NORTH RIDGE PARK |
APPLICATIONS |
|
7.
|
D9284/18 |
HE BUTHELEZI vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
APPLICATIONS |
|
8.
|
D3174/18 |
ZA MSANI vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
APPLICATIONS |
|
9.
|
D13074/18 |
SM MDLULI vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
APPLICATIONS |
|
10.
|
D4547/21 |
B MOHAMED vs B RAMNARAIN & ORS |
APPLICATIONS |
|
11.
|
D1415/19 |
SL MGHABHI vs THE MINISTER OF POLICE |
APPLICATIONS |
|
12.
|
D3473/18 |
BS MTHEMBU vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
APPLICATIONS |
|
13.
|
D4572/21 |
INGULULE TRADING (PTY) LTD vs ETHEKWINI MUNICIPALITY & ANO |
APPLICATIONS |
|
14.
|
D4574/21 |
SOUTH AFRICAN MUNICIPAL WORKERS UNION & ORS vs NEXUS FORENSIC SERVICES (PTY) LTD & ORS |
APPLICATIONS |
|
15.
|
D3452/18 |
SC ZONDI vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
APPLICATIONS |
|
16.
|
5440/17 |
NC NGCOBO vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
APPLICATIONS |
|
17.
|
D4459/19 |
S MAZIBUKO vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
APPLICATIONS |
|
18.
|
D2622/19 |
I MOHAPI vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
APPLICATIONS |
|
19.
|
D4577/21 |
MS BROCKETT vs HOIST SOLUTIONS (PTY) LTD & ANO |
APPLICATIONS |
|
20.
|
D511/20 |
K NAIDOO vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
APPLICATIONS |
|
21.
|
D8679/19 |
TEBFIN (PTY) LTD vs ETHEKWINI MUNICIPALITY & ORS |
APPLICATIONS |
|
22.
|
D2371/21 |
SB GUARANTEE COMPANY PTY LTD vs KMM MLANGENI & ANO |
APPLICATIONS |
|
23.
|
D1014/19 |
JAVA ENGINEERING CC vs NV NKOMZWAYO |
APPLICATIONS |
|
24.
|
D3256/19 |
NI MATOSSE vs ROAD ACCIDENT FUND |
APPLICATIONS |
|
25.
|
D2571/21 |
J DELPORT vs ME LE ROUX & ORS |
APPLICATIONS |
|
26.
|
D1698/21 (A) |
REAL ESTATE DYNAMIC vs MOUNT EDGECOMBE GARAGE |
LIQUIDATIONS / WINDING-UP |
|
27.
|
D5137/21 |
K MOTALA vs R MOOSA |
DIVORCES |
|
28.
|
D1346/21 |
V JUGDUTT vs R JUGDUTT |
DIVORCES |
|
29.
|
D2496/21 |
P LINDIWE vs P PHUMLANI |
DIVORCES |
|
30.
|
D6866/20 |
PA WENTZEL vs J WENTZEL |
RULE 43 |
|
31.
|
D3687/21 |
M VAN ACHTERBERGH vs J VAN ACTHERBERG |
RULE 43 |
|
32.
|
3658/20 |
KWAZULU SUPPLIES & CONSTRUCTION CC vs KWIKFUEL (PTY) LTD
(1 HOUR) |
OPPOSED MOTION |
|
33.
|
3951/20 |
THE STD BANK OF SA LTD vs D GOVENDER
(1 ½ HOURS) |
OPPOSED MOTION |
/rr
Legal Practitioners /Litigants are to take note of the allocated time for the hearing of their matters.
Non-appearances at the allocated time will result in matters been struck off the Roll, Matters will have to be set down again in the usual manner.
Stood down matters will be allocated a time slot after 12h00 by the Judge hearing the matter. Legal Practitioners must leave the court ‘precint’ and return at allocated times after 12h00.
Observing of social distancing: It is recommended that Legal Practitioners /Litigants arrive and be in attendance in the designated area outside the court building not later than 15 minutes before the allocated time on the roll. Legal Practitioners /Litigants will be allowed into the court building 5 matters at a time.
When Legal Practitioners /Litigants in a matter are finished, he/she will exit the courtroom and immediately exit the building.
Urgent matters will be dealt with after the roll or by another Court.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
KWAZULU-NATAL LOCAL DIVISION, DURBAN
COMMENCING AT DURBAN ON FRIDAY, 06th AUGUST 2021
TO BE HEARD BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE MOODLEY
EMAIL ADDRESS: BNtuli@judiciary.org.za (Mabongi)
Landline: 031 362 5832
|
1.
|
7522/18 |
HENQUE 1838 CC vs MAXPROP HOLDINGS (PTY) LTD & ORS |
L COURT |
/rr
NOTICE
Kindly note that there has of recent being a number of
applications for default judgment in terms of Rule 31(2)(a)
of the Uniform Rules of Court set down on the Motion Court
Roll.
Rule 31(2)(a) provides:
“whenever in an action the claim or, if there is more than one claim, any of the claims is not for a debt or liquidated demand and a defendant is in default of delivery of a notice of intention to defend or of a plea, the plaintiff may set the action down as provided in subrule (4) for default judgement and the court may, after hearing evidence, grant judgment against the defendant or make such order as it deems fit”
In Venter v Nel 1997(4) SA 1014(N) at 1016A it was, for example, pointed out that the practice in the Division is to hear some evidence on the claims for damages but that the inquiry is not as detailed or controversial as it would be were the matter defended.
Kindly note that in matters where Rule 31(2)(a) are applicable, dates will not be allocated on the Motion Court Roll. Matters holding such dates are to be removed and referred to Case Flow Management for compliance with Rule 37A and certification, and will thereafter be allocated trial dates.
BY ORDER OF THE REGISTRAR