South Africa: Constitutional Assembly Resources Support SAFLII

You are here:  SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: Constitutional Assembly Resources >> 1995 >> [1995] ZAConAsmRes 857

| Noteup | LawCite

Citizen Contribution: B Hodgert [1995] ZAConAsmRes 857 (16 February 1995)

 

Bruce Hodgert

16 February 1995


Dear Sir/Madam,


I would appreciate it if the following issue be given consideration by the members of the Constituent Assembly. It is in regard to the age of retirement for males in industry, government, farming, N.G.0.s and

other business organisations.

it is my understanding that in the majority of organisations the legal retirement age for males is 65 years and for females 60 years. That is for clerical staff artisans, production workers, labourers and administration persons. I am also aware that a male may elect to retire from age 55 or after 65 subject to the company's approval. However, if a person elects to retire at 63 years he is subject to rather severe penalties. For example : the pension accrued to one in accordance with the retirement formula up to one's early retirement date will be reduced by 3% for the first 2 years and 4% for each subsequent year of early retirement. One's average earnings will be determined over the two years preceding the early retirement (retirement formula = 2% of the average earnings over the last 2 years of service for each year of pensionable service). The above reductions could apply to retirement before 63 years and possibly with the proviso that one must have at least 20 years- service with the same company before retiring at the age of 63 years. I am sure that the registrar of pension funds would comply with the government recommendations. If it was made law that the retirement age of males be 63 years and of females to remain at 60 years, and subject to a company's approval, one could remain still in employment after the age of 63 years for as long as one feels physically and mentally capable.
How many 64 year old bricklayers, mechanics, electricians,

labourers, etc, are to be seen carrying out their original duties as stated in their job descriptions? The majority are either given some meaningless job, or are retrenched, or are simply biding their time until retirement. This unproductivity must cost the economy millions of

Bands per annum.

Furthermore, earlier legislated retirement would mean that thousands of school beavers would get jobs sooner, which could decrease street crime and teenage pregnancy. It would mean that many elderly employees could enjoy their retirement at their ancestral farms or homes without having to eke out an existence on a pension under draconian rules as at present.


Yours sincerely