South Africa: Constitutional Assembly Resources Support SAFLII

You are here:  SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: Constitutional Assembly Resources >> 1995 >> [1995] ZAConAsmRes 1473

| Noteup | LawCite

Citizen Contribution:C Dryden [1995] ZAConAsmRes 1473 (26 May 1995)

 

1995.05.26

Dear Sir/Madam,

I am writing this letter to state that I firmly believe that the "sexual orientation" clause be retained in the final constitution of this country.
When this country went to the polls in April last year, it was with the intention of voting a fully democratic government into power. Everyone has the right to freedom of choice and action, regardless of race, sex, including sexual orientation, religious beliefs, colour culture, etc. If clauses entitling people certain rights (e.g. sexual orientation) are removed from the constitution, it means that the government is no longer fully democratic and that it is then as unjust as the regime it claims to have replaced. We do not question each others cultural or religious beliefs and no do we exclude them from representation in government when they have every right to. Why then should we exclude people on the basis of their sexual orientation.
It has come to my notice that certain groups of people are lobbying for the “sexual orientation" clause to be removed from the final constitution. I trust that my request (along with those of many others) be heeded and that no group be allowed to deny the rights of another particularly by means of pressure.
For the record, I am a white, heterosexual women aged 40, who was brought up to respect the dignity and rights of all

I believe that the vast majority of people in this country feel the same way as I do and it is only a small minority who feel threatened by anything that is "different". These people are entitled to their opinions, but not to force change that would deny rights to others.

C.Dryden (Ms.)