---

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

(NORTH WEST DIVISION, MAHIKENG)

CASE NO.: M 19/15

In the matter between:

ABSA BANK LIMITED                                                                             APPLICANT

and

MATHILDA CATHLEEN WHITE N.O                                        1^ST RESPONDENT

duty appointed EXECUTRIX in the ESTATE

OF THE LATE MATTHEW GILLIAND WHITE and

MATHILDA CATHLEEN WHITE

In terms of Section 13 and 14 of the Administration

of Estates Act 66 of 1965 (as amended)

MATTHEW CHARLES GILLIAND WHITE N.O                     2^ND RESPONDENT

duly appointed EXECUTOR in the ESTATE

OF THE LATE MATTHEW GILLIAND WHITE and

MATHILDA CATHLEEN WHITE

In terms of Section 13 and14 of the Administration

of Estate Act 66 of 1965 (as amended)

JUDGMENT

Landman J:

[1] ABSA Bank Ltd, the applicant, applies on notice of motion against Mathilda Cathleen White NO and Matthews Charles Gilliand White NO, the executrix and executor of the estate of the late Matthew Gilliand White, the first and second respondents, for payment of the sum of R490 526,30 and interest as well as an order declaring the immovable property being security for the loan, to be declared especially executable that a warrant of attachment be issued and that the Sheriff be directed in terms of section 30 of the Administration of Estates Act 66 of 1965 to sell in execution the immovable property. The applicant also seeks costs on an attorney and client scale.

[2] The application was not opposed. I enquired from Mr Scholtz, who appeared on behalf the applicant, whether the applicant was not obliged to lodge a claim for payment with the executrix and executor of the estate. Mr Scholtz submitted that the applicants are entitled to do so, but they were also entitled to resort to litigation. Mr Scholtz kindly supplied me with a copy of the judgment of the Supreme Court of Appeal in Nedbank Ltd v Steyn (20085/2014) [2015] ZASCA 30 (25 March 2015) which held this to be the case.

[3] This is a case where the sale in execution should be authorized in terms of section 30 of the Administration of Estates Act 66 of 1965 in view of the delay by the respondents in finalizing the estate.

[4] The mortgage bond stipulated that the deceased (and thereby his estate) is liable for costs on an attorney and client scale.

Order

[5] I make the following order:

1.     The draft order marked “AAL” is made an order of court.

AA Landman

Judge of the High Court

 

APPEARANCES:

 

Date of hearing:                                                 10 September 2015

 

Date of Judgment:                                             17 September 2015

 

Counsel for the Applicant:                               Adv Scholtz

                                                                                       Instructed by:

                                                                                       D C Kruger Attorneys

---