South Africa: North West High Court, Mafikeng Support SAFLII

You are here:  SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: North West High Court, Mafikeng >> 2007 >> [2007] ZANWHC 22

| Noteup | LawCite

Pole and Another v Stolz and Another (1303/2007) [2007] ZANWHC 22 (21 June 2007)

Download original files

PDF format

RTF format



CASE NO.: 1303/2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

(BOPHUTHATSWANA PROVINCIAL DIVISION)


In the matter between:


LESLEY POLE 1ST APPLICANT

NICHOLAS TRAFFORD RIDLEY POLE 2ND APPLICANT


and



JOHAN STOLTZ 1ST RESPONDENT

MRS STOLTZ 2ND RESPONDENT



JUDGMENT



MAKHAFOLA AJ:


[1] The Applicants are a married couple who have launched an interdict against the Respondent who are also a married couple. The application is in terms of Rule 16(12) of the Uniform Rules of Court predicated on three prayers against the Respondents for allegedly committing a nuisance by creating a state of things on their property adjacent to the applicant’s dwelling place. The state of things in the property of the Respondent is such that it unreasonably and materially caused the applicants disturbance and interference with their ordinary comfort, convenience, peace or quiet. The Applicants and the Respondents reside respectively in no’s 22 and 20 Sabie River Avenue, Cashan Extension 4, Rustenburg.


APPLICANTS’ CASE:

[2] The 1st Applicant has chronicled in detain the events with dates spelling out what their neighbours have done. According to them the Respondents play musical instruments, radios and other devices producing sound at a high pitch which disturbs them, by resounding into their premises beyond the boundaries of the Respondents’ dwelling place.


[3]


__________________

KHAMI MAKHAFOLA

ACTING JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT







APPEARANCES


DATE OF HEARING: 15 MAY 2007

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 21 JUNE 2007


COUNSEL FOR APPLICANT: ADV ACKER

ATTORNEYS FOR APPLICANT: SMIT STANTON INC.


COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS: ADV VAN WYK

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENTS: HERMAN SCHOLTZ ATT.