South Africa: Johannesburg Labour Court, Johannesburg

You are here:
SAFLII >>
Databases >>
South Africa: Johannesburg Labour Court, Johannesburg >>
2019 >>
[2019] ZALCJHB 302
| Noteup
| LawCite
Lekhela v Murray & Roberts Cementation (Pty) Ltd (JR13/16) [2019] ZALCJHB 302 (5 November 2019)
Download original files |
THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG
Not Reportable
Case No: JR13/16
In the matter between:
MARY LEKHELA Applicant
and
MURRAY & ROBERTS CEMENTATION (PTY) LTD Respondent
Considered: In Chambers
Delivered: 05 November 2019
JUDGEMENT: LEAVE TO APPEAL
MABASO, AJ
[1] This is an opposed application for leave to appeal by the applicant against the whole judgment of this Court, delivered on 30 August 2019, which dismissed her review application with no order as to costs.
[2] The test to grant a leave to appeal application is found in section 17 of the Superior Court Act[1], which reads thus:
“Leave to appeal
(1) Leave to appeal may only be given where the judge or judges concerned are of the opinion that –
(a) (i) the appeal would have a reasonable prospect of success; or
(ii) there is some other compelling reason why the appeal should be heard, including conflicting judgments on the matter under consideration;
(b) the decision sought on appeal does not fall within the ambit of section 16 (2) (a); and
(c) where the decision sought to be appealed does not dispose of all the issues in the case, the appeal would lead to a just and prompt resolution of the real issues between the parties”
[3] I have considered all the grounds for leave to appeal, however, not persuaded that there is a reasonable prospect that the findings of this Court might receive a different treatment by the Labour Appeal Court.
[4] In the circumstances, I make the following order:
Order
1. The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
2. There is no order as to costs.
__________________
S. Mabaso
Acting Judge of the Labour Court of South Africa
[1] No. 10 of 2013.