South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria Support SAFLII

You are here:  SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria >> 2017 >> [2017] ZAGPPHC 348

| Noteup | LawCite

Investec Bank Limited v Van heerden and Others (17890/2010) [2017] ZAGPPHC 348 (13 March 2017)

Download original files

PDF format

RTF format


IN THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

(GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, PRETORIA)

CASE NO: 17890/2010

DATE: 13/3/2017



INVESTEC BANK LIMITED                                                                              APPLICANT

and

ANTHEA PHOEBE-JANE VAN HEERDEN                                          1ST  RESPONDENT

1ZAK ALBERTUS VAN HEERDEN                                                      2ND  RESPONDENT

AFRIKINGS (PTY) LTD                                                                         3RD  RESPONDENT

NEW INVEST 263 (PTY) LTD                                                               4TH  RESPONDENT

JUDGMENT

KHUMALO J

INTRODUCTION

[1] This is an application for Judgment in terms of Rule 31 of the High Court Rules. The Applicant is reliant upon a confession of Judgment that was signed by the 1st, 2nd  and 4th  Respondents  on 17 March 2014 pursuant  Applicant instituting an action against them in  2010.

[2] The Respondents were assisted by their attorney a Mr A J Benecke ("Benecke"), who also appended his signature on the confession document. Paragraph 5 of the confession reads:

"We agree that should we default in respect of any of the obligations of the Defendants to the Plaintiff, as set out herein, such default shall be certified by a Manager of the Plaintiff and in that event the Plaintiff shall be entitled to apply in writing through the Registrar to a Judge for judgment to be granted according to this confession for the full outstanding balance then due and payable as applicable, if the Plaintiff has given notice in writing of such application for judgment to our attorney of record whose particulars appear hereunder and the amount remains unpaid for seven (7) days.''

[3] The Applicant attaches a supporting affidavit deposed to by a Ms N B Moatshe, the Applicant's attorney of record alleging that the attorney who witnessed the signatures of the Defendants is Bennecke of the firm Hills Incorporated acting on behalf of the Respondents. To substantiate the allegation a Notice of Intention to defend the action delivered by the Respondents in the matter is attached as Annexure "B".

[4] In terms of Annexure "B" signed on 3 May 2010, the Respondents appointed Gerhard Botha & Partners Inc as their attorneys of record, Care/of S Roux Inc who are situated at office 2/201, Office Park no 2 Top Floor, Cnr Oliphant's & Steenbok Streets, Monument Park in Pretoria. A J Bennecke/ llr/HJ264/10 is mentioned as a reference. There is no Notice of withdrawal by Gerhard Botha & Partners or a Notice of Appointment by Hills Incorporated not been.

[5] The Applicant has given notice of its Application to Attorneys Hills Incorporated who are situated at 835 Jan Shoba Street, Brooklyn, Pretoria, reference AJ Bennecke/idb/JB210/12 without any explanation.

[6] As a result the Application cannot be considered until there is compliance with the terms of the confession.

____________________

NVKHUMALO J

JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT

GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA

For the Applicant:

VDT ATTORNEYS INC

Tel:   012 452-1314

Fax:    086  758 5328

Ref:     Cvav  Eetveldt/AVDB/INVl0/0046 (MAT1486)