South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg Support SAFLII

You are here:  SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg >> 2024 >> [2024] ZAGPJHC 912

| Noteup | LawCite

Limpopo Chamber of Commerce and Industry and Others v Transport Education Training Authority (TETA) (2024/098008) [2024] ZAGPJHC 912 (10 September 2024)

Download original files

PDF format

RTF format


IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

GAUTENG DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG

 

CASE NO: 2024/098008

1. Reportable:

2. Of interest to other judges:

3. Revised:

10 September 2024


 

In the matter between:

 

LIMPOPO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE & INDUSTRY (LCCI)

1st Applicant


ALBERT JELENI 

2nd Applicant


ALL HOST EMPLOYER COMPANIES

3rd Applicant


and



TRANSPORT EDUCATION TRAINING AUTHORITY

(TETA)

Respondent

 

JUDGMENT

 

WRIGHT J

 

1.  The applicant relies on funding from the respondent Transport Education Training Authority for skills development.

 

2.  The applicant seeks urgently an order for payment of money from the respondent.

 

3.  The applicants says, somewhat vaguely, that its interns, those persons who benefit from the relevant skills development program will be prejudiced if the money is not paid over urgently.

 

4.  The lengthy and detailed answering affidavit raises huge disputes of fact. Allegations of irregular financial conduct are made against the applicant. It is also shown that the applicant was aware from April 2024 of the present looming dispute.

 

5.  In these circumstances, urgency is not shown.

 

6.  When the matter was called, Mr SF Selamulela appeared for the applicant, saying that he had just been asked to attend court. The problem, he said, was that counsel for the applicant would arrive from Venda by Thursday.

 

7.  This explanation is unacceptable.

 

8.  After the matter had stood down for about two hours, Mr Selamulela asked for the matter to be removed.

 

9.  Ms P Sokhela opposed, quite reasonably suggesting inconvenience and prejudice.

 

10.  Be that as it may, the matter is not urgent and would need to be removed anyway.

 

ORDER

 

1.  Removed

 

2.  The first and second applicants are jointly and severally to pay the costs of the respondent on the attorney and client scale. -

 

GC Wright

Judge of the High Court

Gauteng Division, Johannesburg

 

HEARD

DELIVERED

:10 September 2024

:10 September 2024


APPEARANCES:

Applicant

Instructed by



Adv Selamulela

Nevelamvi Attorneys Inc

rofhela@gmail.com ; jagpage06@gmail.com

079 657 0238 / 072 222 0188


Respondent



Instructed by

Adv P Sokhela

sokhela@group621.co.za

068 587 1653

Cheadle Thompson & Haysom Inc

Brendan@cth.co.za ;Keagan@cth.co.za ;

Bongumsa@cth.co.za

011 403 2765