South Africa: High Courts - Eastern Cape Support SAFLII

You are here:  SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: High Courts - Eastern Cape >> 2009 >> [2009] ZAECHC 23

| Noteup | LawCite

Law Society of the Cape of Good Hope v Nomoyi (1424/2007) [2009] ZAECHC 23 (27 February 2009)

Download original files

PDF format

RTF format



FORM A





FILING SHEET FOR SOUTH EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISIONJUDGMENT





PARTIES:        The Law Society of the Cape of Good Hope & Khaya Nomoyi           


            Case Number:              1424/07

            High Court:                   Eastern Cape Division

            DATE HEARD:           29/01/09


DATE DELIVERED:               27/02/09



JUDGE(S):                   Froneman; Plasket



LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES –


Appearances:

            for the Applicant(s):      R Brooks

            for the Respondent(s):   In person


Instructing attorneys:

             for the Applicant(s):     Borman & Botha

            for the Respondent(s):  



CASE INFORMATION –

            Nature of proceedings.

            Topic:

            Key Words:

           

           








IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA


EASTERN CAPE DIVISION Case No: 1424/2007




In the matter between

THE LAW SOCIETY OF THE CAPE OF GOOD HOPE Applicant and


KHAYA NOMOYI Respondent




JUDGMENT






Froneman J



In this matter we called for further information on whether the applicant was currently practising as an attorney, an explanation for the delays in bringing the matter to finality and whether the applicant intends to bring a striking out application too and, if so, why such an application has not yet been launched. An affidavit providing this information has now been filed. Except for saying that the affidavit does not explain fully the delays in the matter and that the failure to provide this information in the initial papers is something we do not expect from the custodian of the attorneys profession, there is no reason why the order sought in the notice of motion should not be granted.




An order in terms of paragraphs 1 to 11 of the Notice of Motion is granted.


J.C. FRONEMAN

JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT


I Agree.


C. PLASKET

JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT