South Africa: Competition Tribunal Support SAFLII

You are here:  SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: Competition Tribunal >> 2021 >> [2021] ZACT 78

| Noteup | LawCite

Societe De Promotion Et De Participation Pour La Cooperation v Respublica Group (Pty) Ltd (LM097Oct21) [2021] ZACT 78 (13 December 2021)

Download original files

PDF format

RTF format




COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case No.: LM097Oct21

 

In the matter between:

 

Societe De Promotion Et De Participation Pour La                       Primary Acquiring Firm

Cooperation

 

And

 

Respublica Group (Pty) Ltd                                                            Primary Target Firm

 

 

Panel:                        Y Carrim (Presiding Member)

 M Mazwai (Tribunal Member)

AW Wessels (Tribunal Member)

Heard on:                 13 December 2021

Order Issued on:      13 December 2021

 

 

ORDER

 

 

Further to the recommendation of the Competition Commission in terms of section 14A(1)(b) of the Competition Act, 1998 (“the Act”) the Competition Tribunal orders that–

 

1.            the merger between the abovementioned parties be approved in terms of section 16(2)(a) of the Act; and

 

2.            a Merger Clearance Certificate be issued in terms of Competition Tribunal Rule 35(5)(a).

 

 

13 December 2021

Presiding Member

Ms Yasmin Carrim                                                                                 Date

 

Concurring: Ms Mondo Mazwai and Mr Andreas Wessels

 

 

 

 

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case no: LM097Oct21

 

Societe De Promotion et De Participation Pour La Cooperation Economique SA

(Primary Acquiring Firm)

 

and

 

Respublica Group (Pty) Ltd (Primary Target Firm)

 

 

REASONS FOR DECISION

 

 

[1]          On 13 December 2021, the Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved a large merger between Société de Promotion Et De Participation Pour La Coopération Economique S.A. ("Proparco") and a firm to be incorporated and jointly controlled by Bopa Moruo Fund II Proprietary Limited and RMB Ventures Four Proprietary Limited ("InvestCo"), and the Respublica Group Proprietary Limited ("RG").

 

[2]          In terms of this transaction, Proparco and InvestCo will be subscribing for newly issued shares of RG and will each hold between [….] of the issued shares of RG upon completion of the transaction. Thus, both Proparco and InvestCo will exercise control over RG.

 

[3]          The International Finance Corporation ("IFC") will also subscribe for shares in RG and will also hold between [….] of the issued shares of RG upon completion of the proposed transaction. We note that while the IFC is acquiring similar shareholding in the Target Firm as Proparco and InvestCo (the other acquiring firms), the IFC is not listed as an acquiring firm. In this regard, the merging parties submitted that based on the IFC’s Articles of Agreement referenced in the Article III Notice, the IFC is not required to seek approval in its acquisitions within South Africa. This is an agreement that the IFC has with the South African Government, governed by National Treasury.

 

[4]          The Competition Commission (“the Commission”) did not find any overlaps between the activities of the merging parties as the Acquiring Firm does not sell any products or render any services that are functionally substitutable with those offered by RG.

 

[5]          Therefore, the Commission found that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any of the relevant markets.

 

[6]          The transaction does not have any adverse effect on employment.

 

[7]          The current shareholding of historically disadvantaged persons (“HDPs”) in the Target Firm is negligible. However, InvestCo, which will be one of the joint controllers of RG, is jointly controlled by the Bopa Moruo Group which is [….] owned by HDPs and the RMBV Group, which is ultimately controlled by the FirstRand Group. The FirstRand Group is 27.83% owned by HDPs. The proposed transaction will therefore result in a increase of the ownership of HDPs in the Target Firm from a [….] percentage to above [….] and will have a substantial positive impact on the public interest grounds set out in section 12A(3) of the Competition Act.

 

[8]          There are no other public interest concerns.

 

[9]          We concluded that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market, or to have a negative impact on the public interest.

 

13 December 2021

Ms Yasmin Carrim                                                                                 Date

Ms Mondo Mazwai and Mr Andreas Wessels concurring

 

 

Tribunal Case Manager:       Kameel Pancham

For the Merging Parties:       Werner Rysbergen of DLA Piper Advisory Services

For the Commission:            Nolubabalo Myoli and Grashum Mutizwa