South Africa: Competition Tribunal

You are here:
SAFLII >>
Databases >>
South Africa: Competition Tribunal >>
2021 >>
[2021] ZACT 32
| Noteup
| LawCite
Government Employee Pension Fund (represented by the Public Investment Corporation) v The Leasehold Rights (LM020May21) [2021] ZACT 32 (23 June 2021)
Download original files |
COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case No.: LM020May21
In the matter between:
The Government Employee Pension Fund
(represented by the Public Investment Corporation SOC Ltd) Primary Acquiring Firm
And
The Leasehold Rights (and obligations) in respect of the immovable
property situated at Erf 4525 Jukskei View Extension 89 Township
and letting enterprise that is being conducted in respect of the building(s)
erected thereon Primary Target Firm
Panel: M Mazwai (Presiding Member)
F Tregenna (Tribunal Panel Member)
T Vilakazi (Tribunal Panel Member)
Heard on: 23 June 2021
Order Issued on: 23 June 2021
ORDER
Further to the recommendation of the Competition Commission in terms of section 14A(1)(b) of the Competition Act, 1998 (“the Act”) the Competition Tribunal orders that–
1. the merger between the abovementioned parties be approved in terms of section 16(2)(a) of the Act; and
2. a Merger Clearance Certificate be issued in terms of Competition Tribunal Rule 35(5)(a).
23 June 2021
Presiding Member Date
Ms Mondo Mazwai
Concurring: Prof. Fiona Tregenna and Dr. Thando Vilakazi
COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case no: LM020May21
The Government Employee Pension Fund (represented by the Public Investment
Corporation SOC Limited) (Primary Acquiring Firm)
and
The Leasehold Rights (and obligations) in respect of the immovable property
situated at Erf 4525 Jukskei View Extension 89 Township and the letting enterprise
that is being conducted in respect of the building(s) erected thereon (Primary Target
Firm)
Heard on: 23 June 2021
Order Issued on: 23 June 2021
REASONS FOR DECISION
[1] On 23 June 2021, the Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved a large merger whereby the Government Employee Pension Fund (represented by the Public Investment Corporation SOC Limited) (the “GEPF”) intends to acquire the Leasehold Rights (and obligations) in respect of the immovable property situated at Erf 4525 Jukskei View Extension 89 Township (the “Deloitte Property”) and letting enterprise that is being conducted in respect of the building(s) erected thereon (the “Deloitte Property Business”), as a going concern.[1]
[2] The GEPF is not controlled by any firm, but is managed by the Public Investment Corporation SOC Limited (the “PIC”), which is wholly owned by the South African Government. The GEPF controls a number of firms, none of which are relevant to this transaction.[2]
[3] Pre-merger, the Target Firm is jointly controlled by Dale Creek Investments (Pty) Ltd and Attacq Waterfall Investment Company (Pty) Ltd, and does not control any firm.
[4] The GEPF Group is a ‘defined-benefit fund’ which manages pensions and related benefits on behalf of government employees in South Africa, investing in a variety of asset classes and businesses within various industries. Of relevance, is the fact that the GEPF Group owns office properties or has interests in firms that are active in the property sector, namely through the ownership and/or provision of rentable office space in the Gauteng province.
[5] The Deloitte Property has a gross lettable area of 44,265m2 that is classified as Grade P (premium) office space, and which is in terms of the Deloitte Lease, currently being leased exclusively to Deloitte for a period of 12 years, ending on 31 March 2032.[3]
[6] In its competition assessment, the Competition Commission (the “Commission”) found that there are no horizontal overlaps as the GEPF Group does not own or have interests in firms that own Grade P office space, that could be considered a competitor of the Target Firm, and the Deloitte Lease establishes Deloitte as the sole tenant in the Deloitte Building. In addition, the Commission found no vertical overlaps in the activities of the merging parties as none provide a product or service that could be deemed as an input in the business activities of the other. The Commission concluded that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially lessen or prevent competition in any South African market.
[7] The proposed merger raises no public interest concerns, and no third parties raised any concerns. Further, the merging parties provided an unequivocal statement that there will be no retrenchments as a result of the merger.
[8] In light of the above, we concluded that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. In addition, no public interest issues arise from the proposed transaction.
23 June 2021
Ms Mondo Mazwai Date
Dr Thando Vilakazi and Prof. Fiona Tregenna concurring
Tribunal Case Manager: Camilla Mathonsi
For the Merging Parties: Darren Smith, HB Senekai, Duran Naidoo and Jeremy de Beer of ENSafrica
For the Commission: Rethabile Ncheche and Ratshidaho Maphwanya
[1] Collectively referred to as the Target Firm.
[2] The GEPF and all its subsidiaries will be collectively referred to as the “GEPF Group”.
[3] Deloitte has the option to renew the Deloitte Lease for two additional, consecutive 5-year periods, which would result in Deloitte occupying the Deloitte Building until either March 2037 or March 2042.