South Africa: Competition Tribunal Support SAFLII

You are here:  SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: Competition Tribunal >> 2021 >> [2021] ZACT 10

| Noteup | LawCite

Lereko Capital (Pty) Ltd v Andru Mining (Pty) Ltd (LM179Jan21) [2021] ZACT 10 (24 February 2021)

Download original files

PDF format

RTF format


COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case no: LM179Jan21

Lereko Capital (Pty) Ltd (Primary Acquiring Firm)

and

Andru Mining (Pty) Ltd (Primary Target Firm)

Heard on:                    24 February 2021

Order Issued on:         24 February 2021

REASONS FOR DECISION

[1] On 24 February 2021, the Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved a large merger between Lereko Capital (Pty) Ltd (“Lereko Capital”) and Andru Mining (Pty) Ltd (“Andru Mining”).

[2] The transaction involves Lereko Capital acquiring veto rights over certain reserved matters of Andru Mining, such that Lereko Capital will have negative control over Andru Mining.

[3] Lereko Capital is a private equity fund, whose investment portfolio consists of investments in, amongst others, the renewable energy and student accommodation sectors. […].[1]

[4] Andru Mining’s activities are focused on contract mining operations in different commodities, such as opencast coal mining and hardrock opencast mining. Andru Mining is currently not controlled by any individual or firm.

[5] There are no horizontal or vertical overlaps between the activities of the merger parties. Despite this, the Commission assessed a notional horizontal overlap in the national market for the provision of open cast mining services, to the extent that Lereko Capital already holds 49% of the shares in Andru Mining. The Commission concluded that there would no change to the structure of the market. Andru Mining has an estimated market share of […]. Post-merger, there will be no accretion to the market share.

[6] The merger parties will continue to face competition from other players.[2]

[7] No third parties raised concerns regarding the effects of the proposed transaction on competition or the public interest.

[8] We concluded that the proposed transaction does not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.

[9] In relation to public interest considerations, we note specifically that the proposed transaction will not have a negative effect on the level of Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment or worker ownership, which pre-merger is 53.5%, and will remain the same post-merger.

08 March 2021

Mr Enver Daniels                                                                                                     Date

Ms Mondo Mazwai and Mr Halton Cheadle concurring

Tribunal Case Manager:         Duduetsang Mogapi

For the Merging Parties:         J Lurie and K McLean of Bowman Gilfillan

For the Commission:              M Aphane and T Masithulela

[1] […]

[2] Moolmans, Trollope, and Stefanutti Stocks Mining.