South Africa: Competition Tribunal

You are here:
SAFLII >>
Databases >>
South Africa: Competition Tribunal >>
2017 >>
[2017] ZACT 54
| Noteup
| LawCite
Main Street 1514 (Pty) Ltd v Mancosa (Pty) Ltd and Another (LM072Jun17) [2017] ZACT 54 (10 August 2017)
Download original files |
COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case No: LM072Jun17
In the matter between:
Main Street 1514 (Pty) Ltd Primary Acquiring Firm
And
Mancosa (Pty) Ltd Primary Target Firms
Regent Business School (Pty) Ltd
Panel AW Wessels (Presiding Member)
Medi Mokuena (Tribunal Member)
Yasmin Carrim (Tribunal Member)
Heard on 19 July 2017
Order Issued on 19 July 2017
Reasons Issued on 10 August 2017
Reasons for Decision
Approval
[1] On 19 July 2017, the Competition Tribunal ("Tribunal") unconditionally approved the transaction involving Main Street 1514 Proprietary Limited ("Main Street"), Mancosa Proprietary Limited ("Mancosa") and Regent Business School Proprietary Limited ("Regent").
[2] The reasons for approving the proposed transaction follow.
Parties to the proposed transaction
Primary acquiring firm
[3] The primary acquiring firm is Main Street, a newly established entity for purposes of the proposed transaction. Main Street currently conducts no business activities in South Africa.
[4] Main Street is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Actis Investment Holdings No.
190 Limited ("EMK SA (Mauritius)"), which in turn is wholly-owned by Emerging Markets Knowledge Holdings Limited ("EMKH"). EMKH is a company incorporated in accordance with the laws of Mauritius. EMKH is controlled by Actis Africa 4 LP ("Actis Africa 4") and Actis Global 4 LP ("Actis Global 4") which are private equity investment funds. Actis Africa 4 and Actis Global 4 are managed by Actis GP LLP. Actis GP LLP is not controlled by any single firm. The abovementioned firms will hereinafter collectively be referred to as "the Actis Group".
[5] The Actis Group is a global private equity investor which invests in emerging markets. Of relevance to the competition assessment of the current transaction is that EMKH is a tertiary education buy-and-build platform, serving students in Tunisia and Morocco. The Actis Group however has no tertiary educational activities in South Africa.
Primary target firms
[ 6 ] The primary target firms are Mancosa and Regent. Both these companies are incorporated in accordance with the laws of the Republic of South Africa. Mangro Holdings Proprietary Limited ("Mangro") is currently the sole shareholder of Mancosa and Regent. Mancosa and Regent do not control any firm in South Africa.
[7] Mancosa and Regent's business activities involve the provision of tertiary education and long dist'llnce programmes for undergraduate and postgraduate students in inter a/ia South Africa.
Proposed transaction and rationale
[8] Upon completion of the proposed transaction, Main Street will own the entire shareholding of Mancosa and Regent and thus have sole control over Mancosa and Regent.
[9] The Actis Group submitted that the proposed transaction will enable it to establish a portfolio of education providers across Africa.
[10] Mangro wishes to realise a return on its investment.
Impact on competition
[11] The Competition Commission ("Commission") identified a broad horizontal overlap between the activities of the merging parties in the provision of tertiary education services. However, the Actis Group is not active in the provision of tertiary education services in South Africa and thus there is no geographical overlap between the activities of the merging parties in South Africa. The Commission therefore concluded that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market in South Africa. We concur with the Commission's finding.
Public interest
[12] The merging parties confirmed that the proposed transaction will not have any negative effect on employment in South Africa.[1]
[13] The proposed transaction further raises no other public interest concerns.
Conclusion
[1 ] In light of the above, we conclude that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. In addition, no public interest issues arise from the proposed transaction. Accordingly, we approve the proposed transaction unconditionally.
10 August 2017
DATE
_________________
Mr AW Wessels,
Ms Yasmin Carrim and Ms Medi Mokuena concurring
Tribunal Case Manager : Caroline Sserufusa
For the merging parties : Robert Wilson of Webber Wentzel
For the Commission : Nonhlanhla Msiza
[1] Merger Record, pages 5 and 53. Also see Transcript, pages 5 and 6.