South Africa: Competition Tribunal Support SAFLII

You are here:  SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: Competition Tribunal >> 2013 >> [2013] ZACT 104

| Noteup | LawCite

Resilient Properties (Pty) Ltd v Arbour Town (Pty) Ltd (017772) [2013] ZACT 104 (29 October 2013)

Download original files

PDF format

RTF format


COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA


Case No.: 017772

In the matter between:

Resilient Properties (Pty) Ltd Primary Acquiring Firm

and

Arbour Town (Pty) Ltd Primary Target Firm



Panel

Norman Manoim (Presiding Member)


Yasmin Carrim (Tribunal Member)


Andreas Wessels (Tribunal Member)

Heard on

01 October 2013

Order issued on

01 October 2013

Reasons issued

29 October 2013

DECISION

Unconditional approval



[1] On 01 October 2013, the Competition Tribunal (“Tribunal”) unconditionally approved the proposed acquisition by Resilient Properties (Pty) Ltd of Arbour Town (Pty) Ltd.

[2] The reasons for approving the proposed transaction follow.

Parties to transaction

[3] The primary acquiring firm is Resilient Properties (Pty) Ltd (“Resilient”). Resilient is controlled by the Resilient Property Income Fund, a listed property loan stock company which owns 29 properties in 8 provinces, except the Western Cape.



[4] The primary target firm is Arbour Town (Pty) Ltd (“Arbour Town”). Arbour Town is controlled by Louis Peens, who holds a 53% shareholding (32% thereof is directly controlled whilst the remaining 21% interest is held indirectly through Marketcorp Holdings). The remaining shares are held by Julie Peens, Anke Beauregard, Roy Parbhoo, Silke Peens and Resilient. Resilient currently holds a 10% interest in Arbour Town.

[5] The only business which Arbour Town conducts relates to its investment in two retail properties located in Amanzimtoti, Kwa-Zuiu Natal, namely Arbour Crossing and Galleria Shopping Centre.

[6] Arbour Crossing is classified as a lifestyle shopping centre, whilst Galleria Shopping Centre is classified as a regional shopping centre.

[7] Of relevance to this transaction is that Resilient currently owns a 10% interest in Arbour Town, as well two other centres in the Kwa-Zulu Natal region. One of these other two centres is a regional centre located in Richards Bay and the other is a community shopping centre located in Ladysmith.

Proposed transaction and rationale

[8] In terms of the proposed transaction, Resilient will acquire the remaining 90% interest in Arbour Town which it does not already own. Post-implementation of the proposed transaction, Resilient will have sole control over Arbour Town. During the course of the merger hearing, it was indicated that Arbour Town will be dissolved, resulting in Resilient holding a direct interest in the two retail properties.1

[9] Resilient submitted that the proposed transaction is aligned with its strategy of investing in retail properties.

[10] The Sellers are natural persons who view the transaction as an attractive opportunity to reduce their financial exposure to a single business, thereby facilitating the diversification of their business interests.



Competition assessment

Overlaps

[11] The Commission found that the proposed transaction will result in a product overlap in the market for the provision of rentable retail property, more specifically relating to regional shopping centres. The acquiring firm’s holding company, Resilient Property Income Fund, owns the Boardwalk Shopping Centre in Richards Bay, Kwa-Zulu Natal. The Boardwalk Shopping Centre is also a regional shopping centre, however, it is located more than 190 kilometres from the target property which has the same classification, being the Galleria Shopping Centre in Amanzimtoti, Kwa-Zulu Natal. Due to this distance between the two centres, no geographic overlap will arise from this transaction.

Conclusion

[12] We conclude that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.

Public interest

[13] The merging parties confirmed that the proposed transaction will not have any adverse impact on employment and that no retrenchments will result from the proposed transaction.2 No other public interest issues arise as a result of this transaction.


CONCLUSION

[14] Having regard to the facts above, we find that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. Furthermore, no public interest concerns arise as a result of the proposed transaction. Accordingly, we approve the proposed merger unconditionally.

NORMAN MANOIM


29 October 2013

DATE



Yasmin Carrim and Andreas Wessels concurring

Tribunal Researcher: Nicola IIgner

For the Commission: Gilberto Biacuana

For the merging parties: Susan Meyer of Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr Inc.

1 See page 3 of the transcript.

2 See pages 40 and 51 of the merger record.