South Africa: Competition Tribunal Support SAFLII

You are here:  SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: Competition Tribunal >> 2012 >> [2012] ZACT 94

| Noteup | LawCite

Fairvest Property Holdings Ltd v Portfolio of commercial properties of SA Corporate Real Estate Fund (84/LM/Aug12) [2012] ZACT 94 (7 November 2012)

Download original files

PDF format

RTF format




COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA





Case No: 84/LM/Aug12

(015610)







In the matter between:

Fairvest Property Holdings Limited Primary ......................................Acquiring Firm



And



A portfolio of commercial properties of

SA Corporate Real Estate Fund Primary .............................................................Target Firms



Panel : Andreas Wessels (Presiding Member) Medi Mokuena (Tribunal Member) Takalani Madima (Tribunal Member)

Heard on : 24 October 2012

Order issued on : 24 October 2012

Reasons issued on : 07 November 2012





Reasons for Decision





Conditional approval



  1. On 24 October 2012 the Competition Tribunal (“Tribunal”) conditionally approved the acquisition by Fairvest Property Holdings Limited of a portfolio of commercial properties of SA Corporate Real Estate Fund.

  2. The reasons for conditionally approving the proposed transaction follow below.



Parties to transaction



  1. The primary acquiring firm is Fairvest Property Holdings Limited (“Fairvest”), a JSE-listed property investment holding company. Fairvest currently holds a number of commercial properties in the Eastern Cape, Free State, Gauteng and KwaZulu-Natal.

  2. The primary target firms are a portfolio of commercial properties of the SA Corporate Real Estate Fund (“SACREF”). SACREF is a diversified real estate investment fund invested in retail, office and industrial properties situated in the major metropolitan areas of South Africa.

  3. The to be acquired properties comprise of one office rental property, namely Omniplace located at Rosen Park in the Western Cape, and the following ten retail properties:

  1. 210 Church Street – Pietermaritzburg;

  2. 212 Church Street – Pietermaritzburg;

  3. 425 West Street – Durban Central;

  4. The Ridge – Honeydew Ridge;

  5. Clubview Corner – Clubview;

  6. Middelburg Pick ’n Pay - Middelburg;

  7. Tokai Junction – Tokai;

  8. Main Street – Gingindlovu;

  9. Mkuze Corner – Mkuze; and

  10. St Georges Square – George.



Proposed transaction and rationale

  1. In terms of the proposed transaction, Fairvest will acquire the above-mentioned eleven letting enterprises from SACREF, each as a going concern (hereinafter referred to as “the target properties”). Post-transaction, Fairvest will exercise sole control over the target properties.

  2. According to Fairvest, the proposed transaction is in line with its current expansion strategy.

  3. The seller, SACREF, no longer wishes to hold the target properties.

Competition and public interest assessment

  1. Although both the merging parties own rentable retail and commercial office space in South Africa, there is no geographic overlap between their activities since their properties are located in different geographic nodes.

  2. The Competition Commission (Commission”), however, in relation to three of target shopping centres, namely St Georges Square (George), Mkuze Corner (Mkuze) and Middelburg Pick ’n Pay, raised a concern pertaining to certain exclusivity clauses contained in the existing lease agreements with anchor tenants. These lease agreements expire in 2013 and 2014.

  3. The Commission was concerned that these exclusivity clauses could have the effect of preventing small businesses, such as butcheries, bakeries, delicatessen stores and the like, from gaining access to rentable retail space in the respective shopping centres. In order to address this concern the Commission, based on certain undertakings by the merging parties, recommended that certain conditions be attached to the approval of this transaction.

  4. The above-mentioned exclusivity clauses in the lease agreements with anchor tenants raise likely public interest concerns in terms of section 12A(3)(c) of the Competition Act of 19981 and conditions are therefore warranted to address such concerns. As such, the Tribunal has approved the proposed merger subject to the following conditions:

    1. Fairvest shall negotiate with Checkers, Pick ‘n Pay and Bridge Wholesale in the utmost good faith to have the exclusivity clause in the lease agreement removed at the renewal of the lease in respect of each of the following centres and on the dates indicated below:

  • St Georges Square (2013)

  • Middelburg Pick ‘n Pay (2013)

  • Mkuze Corner (2014)



    1. Fairvest shall within thirty days after entering into a new lease agreement with Checkers, Pick ‘n Pay and Bridge Wholesale in the above listed centres, provide the Commission with a report setting out in detail the extent to which they have complied with the above condition.

  1. The merging parties confirmed that no negative effects on employment are envisaged as a result of the proposed transaction.2 Apart from the above-mentioned likely effects on small businesses as a result of certain exclusivity provisions in certain existing lease agreements, the proposed deal raises no other public interest concerns.

CONCLUSION

  1. We approve the proposed transaction subject to the above highlighted conditions. A full set of the imposed conditions is attached hereto as “Annexure A”.







____________________ 07 November 2012

ANDREAS WESSELS DATE



Medi Mokuena and Takalani Madima concurring



Tribunal researcher: Nicola Ilgner

For the merging parties: Ahmore Burger-Smidt of Werksmans Attorneys

For the Commission: Zanele Hadebe


1Act No. 89 of 1998, as amended.

2See pages 10, 89 and 121 of the merger record.

5