[Home] [Databases] [WorldLII] [Search] [Feedback] South African Law Commission

You are here:  SAFLII >> Databases >> South African Law Commission >> Report >> 1998_5 >> BIBLIOGRAPHY AND MODE OF CITATION

[Database Search] [Name Search] [Previous] [Next] [Download] [Help]

BIBLIOGRAPHY AND MODE OF CITATION

Andrews “The class action”

Andrews N H “The class action” in J P Gardner (ed) United Kingdom Law in the 1990s London: UKNCCL 1990 pp. 133 - 151.

Australian Law Reform Commission Access to the Courts II - Class Actions

Australian Law Reform Commission Access to the Courts II - Class Actions (Discussion Paper No 11) Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service 1979.

Australian Law Reform Commission Grouped Proceedings in the Federal Court

Australian Law Reform Commission Grouped Proceedings in the Federal Court (Report No 46) Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service 1988.

Australian Law Reform Commission Costs shifting - Who pays for litigation?

Australian Law Reform Commission Costs shifting - Who pays for litigation? (Report No 75) Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service 1995.

Australian Law Reform Commission Who can sue?

Australian Law Reform Commission Who can sue? A review of the law of standing (Discussion Paper No 61) Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service 1995.

Australian Law Reform Commission Beyond the door-keeper

Australian Law Reform Commission Beyond the door-keeper: Standing to sue for public remedies (Report No 78) Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service 1996.

Bottomley 1992 (15) University of New South Wales Law Journal

Bottomley S “Shareholder derivative actions and public interest suits: Two versions of the same story” 1992 (15) University of New South Wales Law Journal 127 - 148.

Bryden 1987 (66) Canadian Bar Review

Bryden P L “Public interest intervention in the courts” 1987 (66) Canadian Bar Review 490 - 528.

Cappelletti (ed) Access to Justice

Cappelletti M (ed) Access to Justice and the Welfare State Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthoff 1981.

Cram 1995 (4) Juridical Review

Cram I “Towards good administration - the reform of standing in Scots Public Law” 1995 (4) Juridical Review 332 - 344.

De Vos 1996 (4) Journal of South African Law

De Vos W le R “Reflections on the introduction of a class action in South Africa” 1996 (4) Journal of South African Law 639 - 657.

De Vos LL.M thesis

De Vos W le R Verteenwoordiging van groepsbelange in die siviele prosesreg (unpublished LL.M thesis) Rand Afrikaans University 1984.

Dixon 1997 (46) ICLQ

Dixon J C L “The res judicata effect in England of a US class action settlement” 1997 (46) International and Comparative Law Quarterly 134 - 150.

Eckard Die locus standi van aansoekers

Eckard Die locus standi van aansoekers by die geregtelike hersiening van administratiewe handelinge (unpublished LLD thesis) University of South Africa 1975.

Eden “Group actions: The Scottish position”

Eden S M “Group actions: The Scottish position” in J P Gardner (ed) United Kingdom Law in the 1990s London: UKNCCL 1990 pp. 152 - 159.

Editorial 1978 (91) Harvard Law Review

Editorial "Defendant class actions" 1978 (91) Harvard Law Review 630 - 658.

Esterhuysen Die publiek se kennis van en houding jeens die Regshulpraad

Esterhuysen R Sekere kategorieë van die publiek se kennis van en houding jeens die Regshulpraad en aanverwante aspekte (HSRC Research Report S-114) Pretoria: HSRC 1984.

Fleming 1994 (42) American Journal of Comparative Law

Fleming J G “Mass torts” 1994 (42) American Journal of Comparative Law 507 - 529.

Friedlander 1995 (40) McGill Law Journal

Friedlander L “Costs and the public interest litigant” 1995 (40) McGill Law Journal 55 - 102.

Fudge 1987 (25) Osgoode Hall Law Journal

Fudge J “The public / private distinction: The possibilities of and the limits to the use of Charter litigation to further feminist struggles” 1987 (25) Osgoode Hall Law Journal 485 - 554.

Grant 1996 (63) University of Chicago Law Review

Grant M A “The right not to sue: A First Amendment rationale for opting out of mandatory class actions” 1996 (63) University of Chicago Law Review 239 - 273.

Hickinbottom 1995 The Litigator

Hickinbottom G R “Multi-Party actions in England and Scotland: Compare and contrast” 1995 The Litigator 190

Hodge 1995 (14) Civil Justice Quarterly

Hodge H “Current issues in access to justice: Legal aid and costs” 1995 (14) Civil Justice Quarterly 102 - 106.

Hohfeld 1913 (23) Yale Law Journal

Hohfeld W N "Some fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning" 1913 (23) Yale Law Journal 16 - 59.

Homburger 1974 (23) Buffalo Law Review

Homburger A "Private suits in the public interest in the United States of America" 1974 (23) Buffalo Law Review 343 - 410.

Hough 1991 Denning Law Journal

Hough B “Standing for pressure groups and the representative plaintiff” 1991 Denning Law Journal 77

Jaffe 1968 (116) University of Pennsylvania Law Review

Jaffe L L "The citizen as litigant in public actions: The non-Hohfeldian or ideological plaintiff" 1968 (116) University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1033 - 1047.

Judin “Class actions”

Judin M “Class actions could become feature of our legal system” Business Day 23 February 1996 18.

Koch J 1990 (48) University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review

Koch J “Making room: New directions in third party intervention”1990 (48) University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review 151 - 167.

Lane 1988 (18) Queensland Law Society Journal

Lane P D “Standing to sue for a Declaration and Injunction in the public interest” 1988 (18) Queensland Law Society Journal 115

Law Society (England and Wales) Group Actions made easier

Law Society (England and Wales) Group Actions made easier (Report by the Law Society’s Civil Litigation Committee) September 1995.

Lindblom and Watson 1993 (12) Civil Justice Quarterly

Lindblom P H and G D Watson “Complex litigation - A comparative perspective” 1993 (12) Civil Justice Quarterly 33 - 91.

Loots 1987 (104) SALJ

Loots C "Locus standi to claim relief in the public interest in matters involving the enforcement of legislation" 1987 (104) South African Law Journal 131 - 148.

McBryde and Barker 1991 New Law Journal

McBryde W W and C Barker “Solicitors’ groups in mass disaster claims” 1991 New Law Journal 484 - 487, 504.

Morabito and Epstein Class actions in Victoria

Morabito V and J Epstein Class actions in Victoria: Time for a new approach (Victorian Attorney-General’s Law Reform Advisory Council Expert Report 2) Melbourne: Victorian Law Reform Advisory Council 1997.

Ontario Commission Report on Class Actions

Ontario Law Reform Commission Report on Class Actions (volumes 1 - 3) Toronto: Ministry of the Attorney General 1982.

Ontario AGA Committee Class Action Reform

Ontario Attorney General’s Advisory Committee Report on Class Actions Reform Toronto: Ministry of the Attorney General 1990.

Paterson 1991 (10) Civil Justice Quarterly

Paterson A “Legal aid at the crossroads” 1991 (10) Civil Justice Quarterly 124 - 137.

Ross 1995 (33) Osgoode Hall Law Journal

Ross J M “Standing in Charter declaratory actions” 1995 (33) Osgoode Hall Law Journal 151 - 201.

Safranek 1996 (22) Wisconsin Law Review

Safranek S J “Do class action plaintiffs lose their constitutional rights?” 1996 (22) Wisconsin Law Review 263 - 294.

Scott 1973 (86) Harvard Law Review

Scott K E “Standing in the Supreme Court - a functional analysis” 1973 (86) Harvard Law Review 645 - 692.

Scottish Law Commission Multi-Party Actions Discussion Paper

Scottish Law Commission Multi-Party Actions: Court Proceedings and Funding (Discussion Paper No 98) November 1994.

Scottish Law Commission Multi-Party Actions Working Party Report

Scottish Law Commission Multi-Party Actions: Report by Working Party set up by Scottish Law Commission June 1993.

Scottish Law Commission Multi-Party Actions Report

Scottish Law Commission Multi-Party Actions (Report No 154) Edinburgh: HMSO 1996.

South African Law Commission Working Paper 57

South African Law Commission Working Paper 57: The recognition of a class action in South African law Pretoria: South African Law Commission 1995.

South African Law Commission Report on speculative and contingency fees

South African Law Commission Project 93: Report on speculative and contingency fees Pretoria: South African Law Commission 1996.

Susman 1994 (13) Wisconsin International Law Journal

Susman S D “Distant voices in the courts of India - Transformation of standing in public interest litigation” 1994 (13) Wisconsin International Law Journal 57 - 103.

Swedish Commission Group Actions

Swedish Commission on Group Actions Report to the [Swedish] Minister of Justice on Group Actions (Summary in English) Malmo, 1995.

Thomas Textbook of Roman Law

Thomas J A C Textbook of Roman Law Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing 1976.

Uniform Law Conference of Canada Class Actions Discussion Paper

Uniform Law Conference of Canada Class Actions Discussion Paper, Quebec City, Quebec, August 6 - 10, 1995.

Van Wyk et al Rights and Constitutionalism

Van Wyk D et al Rights and Constitutionalism - The new South African Legal Order Cape Town: Juta 1994.

Vern 1988 (18) Queensland Law Society Journal

Vern P “Standing to sue for a declaration and injunction in the public interest” 1988 (18) Queensland Law Society Journal 115

Welch 1985 (43) University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review

Welch J “No room at the top: Interest group intervenors and Charter litigation in the Supreme Court of Canada” 1985 (43) University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review 204 - 231.

White and Willock Scottish Legal System

White R M and I D Willock The Scottish Legal System Edinburgh: Butterworths 1993.

Williams 1975 (13) Osgoode Hall Law Journal

Williams N J “Consumer class actions in Canada - Some proposals for reform” 1975 (13) Osgoode Hall Law Journal 1 - 88.

Wolfson 1977 (38) Ohio State Law Journal

Wolfson "Defendant class actions" 1977 (38) Ohio State Law Journal 459

Woolf Inquiry Access to Justice

Woolf, Rt Hon the Lord Access to Justice (Interim Report to the Lord Chancellor on the Civil Justice System in England and Wales) London: HMSO June 1995.

Woolf Inquiry Multi-Party Actions: Issues Paper

Woolf Inquiry Multi-Party Actions: Issues Paper January 1996.

Zimbabwe Law Development Commission Interim Report on Group Proceedings

Zimbabwe Law Development Commission Interim Report on Group Proceedings (Report No 15) November 1991.