Competition analysis
[20]
As pointed out above, there appears to be a horizontal overlap between the merging parties’ respective
gases businesses. However, such an overlap appears to be limited to the sale of ethylene and calibration gases. The merging parties
advised us that Linde AG has had de minimis sales of these products into South Africa. They further provided us with the estimated market shares below in relation to the aforesaid
affected products.
[21]
With regards to the sale of calibration gases in South Africa, the merging parties market shares estimates are as follows: Air Liquide (28%); Air Products (28%); BOC (48%); and Others (including
Linde AG) <1. Since the Commission defined the geographic market with respect to calibration gases as global in nature, the Commission contended
that the combined market shares of the merged entity would be significantly diluted as follows: Air Liquide (30%); Air Products (24%);
PraxAir (10%); BOC (7%); Linde (6%); and Others (23%).
[22]
One sees from the above market share estimates that the merging parties would become the world’s
number three (3) player with post-merger market shares of approximately 13%. Air Liquide and Air Products – both being the
merging parties’ competitors – will have 30% and 24% of the market shares respectively. We now turn to consider the market
for the manufacture and supply of ethylene gas.
[23]
With regards to the market for the manufacture and supply of ethylene in, into or from South Africa,
the merging parties submitted that BOC did not derive any turnover thereof for the 2005 financial year. However, BOC pointed out
that it is currently selling ethylene into South Africa and shall continue to do so post-merger. BOC considers Air Liquide as its
primary competitor pertaining to ethylene sales in South Africa. Linde AG also sells ethylene in South Africa. BOC estimates Linde
AG’s market shares to be less than 1%, but was unable to provide us with the market share estimates for Air Liquide. The Commission
asserted that Linde AG’s market shares might be diluted further since its view is that the geographic market for ethylene gas
is global. Further to this, the merging parties submitted their estimates of the market shares for the global market of ethylene
gas as follows: Ballchem (45%); Chemogas (comprising Linde AG’s sales) (15%); Gerlingholz (15%); Avantec (10%); BOC <1%;
and Others (15%).
[24]
During its investigation, the Commission contacted and received views of the merging parties’ customers
with respect to the proposed merger. None of the customers raised any concerns with respect to the proposed merger. We now turn to consider the likely impact or otherwise of the proposed merger to the ethylene market.
[25]
With regards to the ethylene gas market, the Commission’s investigation revealed that the merging
parties’ market share is less than 1%. In addition, the merging parties contended that there are other suppliers in this market,
such as Air Products and Air Liquide. The Commission’s investigation also revealed that it is possible to switch from one supplier
to another.
[26]
The merging parties contended that there are no regulatory barriers to entry into the gases business
that prevent or restrict cross-border sales of specialty gases. According to the merging parties, a new entrant does not need significant
investment to venture into these markets. They submitted that there have been a number of entrants recently in the specialty gases
market internationally, but not in South Africa. These customers of specialty gases include multi-national companies many of whom
have a multi-sourcing policy in place. This, in our view, suggests that these customers may readily and easily switch between various suppliers of specialty gases.
Public Interest
[27]
The merging parties submitted that Linde has no physical presence locally in relation to gases. However,
we note that Linde has two local subsidiaries that deal with material handling and process plants. The merging parties submitted
that the proposed transaction would not have an impact on the business or employment levels of either of Linde’s local subsidiaries. They also submitted that they anticipate no job losses on any of BOC employees in South Africa or the employees of any of BOC’s
subsidiaries (including Afrox) in South Africa.
Conclusion
[28]
In light of the reasons set out above, we are satisfied that the proposed transaction is unlikely to
result in a substantial prevention or lessening of competition in the relevant markets. We accordingly approve the proposed transaction
unconditionally.
______________
N Manoim
Presiding Member
L Reyburn and M Mokuena concurring.
Tribunal Researcher: T Masithulela
For Linde AG
:
K de Kock (Webber Wentzel Bowens)
For BOC Plc
:
M. Garden (Edward Nathan Corporate Law
Advisors)
For the Commission
:
T Kekana (Mergers & Acquisitions)
SAFLII:
|
Terms of Use
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACT/2006/97.html