You are here:
SAFLII >>
Databases >>
South Africa: Competition Tribunal >>
2002 >>
[2002] ZACT 22
[Database Search]
[Name Search]
[Recent Decisions]
[Noteup]
[Help]
Imperial Holdings Limited and Murnau Holdings (Pty) Ltd (16/LM/Mar02) [2002] ZACT 22 (11 April 2002)
.RTF of original document
COMPETITION TRIBUNAL
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case No: 16/LM/Mar02
In the large merger between:
Imperial Holdings Limited
and
Murnau Holdings (Pty) Ltd
_____________________________________________________________
Reasons
_____________________________________________________________
Approval
1.
On 03 April 2002 we approved without conditions the merger between Imperial Holdings Limited (Imperial) and Murnau Holdings (Pty)
Ltd (Murnau). Our reasons for this decision are set out below.
The Transaction
2.
Imperial is acquiring the entire issued share capital in Murnau from Gunther E. R. Reichhelm (Gunther Reichhelm), who is currently
the sole shareholder in Murnau. Murnau is the holding company for various dealerships that sell BMW, Opel and Isuzu motor vehicles.
Gunther Reichhelm is selling to Imperial these dealerships, together with the properties on which those dealerships conduct business.
The sale excludes dealerships and properties in Rustenberg.
3.
The sale came about as result of Gunther Reichhelm’s decision to retire from business. For Imperial, the transaction represents
an opportunity to obtain representation in the Vereeniging and Vanderbijlpark areas and to increase the number of its BMW dealerships.
Currently Imperial has only 3 BMW dealerships nationwide.
The Relevant Market
4.
Murnau sells BMW motor vehicles in Vereeniging and Vanderbijlpark and Isuzu and Opel motor vehicles in Bloemfontein, Benoni and Louis
Trichard.
5.
Imperial is involved in diverse business activities ranging from motoring, tourism, aviation leasing and related financial services.
The motoring business of Imperial consists of dealerships that sell, inter alia, BMW, Opel and Isuzu motor vehicles.
6.
For purposes of this transaction, the Commission divides the motor vehicle industry broadly into passenger and commercial vehicles,
the former being vehicles for the general purpose of transporting individuals and the latter being vehicles designed for commercial
usage. Commercial vehicles are further divided into light, medium, heavy commercial vehicles and buses and coaches. The passenger
vehicles market has further sub-markets ranging from entry-level to upper luxury cars.
7.
Both parties sell entry-level and medium commercial vehicles but the Commission found that whether an overlap exists or not depends
on the geographic boundaries of the market. It found that where the market is defined as a local market, limited to towns and surrounding
areas, then there will be no overlap in the products of the merging firms as Murnau and Imperial do not have dealerships in the same
town in South Africa. Where the market is described as a regional market, then there is an overlap in Gauteng in that both parties
sell entry-level and medium commercial motor vehicles in this province – Murnau in Vereeniging and Vanderbijlpark and Imperial
in Benoni.
8.
The Commission’s view is that whether the market is defined as local or regional is immaterial because the merger does not raise
any competition concerns on either market definition. Where the market is defined as regional, then the merging parties dealerships
would be competing with dealerships from places like Johannesburg and Pretoria, leaving them with insignificant market shares. In
any event, the Commission found that there is strong inter-brand and intra-brand competition in the market.
9.
We agree with the Commission’s analysis and conclusions and endorse its report.
Public Interest Issues
10.
As the business of Murnau is being acquired as a going concern, it is not envisaged that there will be any job losses as a result
of the merger. No representation was made by the registered trade unions on behalf of the employees of the parties.
Finding
11.
We find that the merger between Imperial Holdings Limited and Murnau Holdings (Pty) Ltd is not likely to result in the substantial
lessening or prevention of competition in the market. There are no substantial public interest concerns resulting from the merger.
____________________
11 April 2002
N. M. Manoim
Date
Concurring: D.H.Lewis, P. Maponya
SAFLII:
|
Terms of Use
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACT/2002/22.html
