LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases Referring to this Journal Article | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Journal Article | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Journal Article | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

"Admissibility of Out-of-Court Identification Evidence in Criminal Cases, The"   flag  1

(1979-1980) 12 Melbourne University Law Review 543
Weinberg, Mark
Melbourne University Law Review
Australia

Law Reform Reports Referring to this Journal Article

Journal Article Title Citation(s) Author Jurisdiction Date †  Full Text Citation Index
Evidence (Interim) [1985] ALRC 26 Australian Law Reform Commission Australia circa 1985 AustLII flag 5

Legislation Cited

Legislation Name Provision
Evidence Act 1958 (Vic)

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date †  Full Text Citation Index
"Consistent Statements of a Witness" (1979) 17 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 285 Osgoode Hall Law Journal Canada circa 1979 HeinOnline / LexisNexis flag 4
"Consistent Statements of a Witness" (1979) 17 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 286 Osgoode Hall Law Journal Canada circa 1979 HeinOnline / LexisNexis flag 1
"Prior Inconsistent Statements: The Hearsay Rule, 801 (d)(I)(A) and 803(24)" (1979) 26 UCLA Law Review 967 UCLA Law Review United States circa 1979 HeinOnline / LexisNexis flag 1
R v Freeman [1980] VicRp 1; [1980] VR 1 Australia - Victoria 15 Nov 1978 AustLII flag 76
"Hearsay and the Hearsay Rule: A Functional View" [1978] Canadian Bar Review 674 Canadian Bar Review Canada circa 1978 flag 1
"Hearsay and the Hearsay Rule: A Functional View" (1978) 56 Canadian Bar Review 674 Canadian Bar Review Canada circa 1978 flag 1
"Refreshing Memory" [1978] Criminal Law Review 408 Criminal Law Review United Kingdom circa 1978 Westlaw flag 1
"The Use of Photographs for the Purpose of Identification" [1978] Criminal Law Review 343 Criminal Law Review United Kingdom circa 1978 Westlaw flag 2
R v Taylor [1978] Crim LR 92 United Kingdom circa 1978 Westlaw flag 1
Guy and Finger v R [1978] WAR 125 Australia - Western Australia circa 1978 LexisNexis AU flag 2
R v Virgo [1978] Crim LR 557 United Kingdom circa 1978 Westlaw flag 2
"Consequences of Failure to Object to Inadmissible Evidence in Criminal Cases, The" (1977-1978) 11 Melbourne University Law Review 408 Melbourne University Law Review Australia circa 1978 AustLII flag 13
R v Nye and Loan [1978] Crim LR 94 United Kingdom circa 1978 Westlaw flag 1
"Evidence of Past Identification" [1977] Criminal Law Review 268 Criminal Law Review United Kingdom circa 1977 Westlaw flag 2
R v Russell [1977] 2 NZLR 20 New Zealand circa 1977 LexisNexis flag 23
R v Penno [1977] 3 WWR 361 Canada circa 1977 flag 1
R v Wilson [1977] Crim LR 553 United Kingdom circa 1977 Westlaw flag 4
R v Collings [1976] 2 NZLR 104 New Zealand circa 1976 LexisNexis flag 18
R v Thynne [1977] VicRp 10; [1977] VR 98 Australia - Victoria 6 Nov 1975 AustLII flag 32
R v McGuire (1975) 4 WWR 124 Canada circa 1975 flag 4
"The Judicial Discretion to Exclude Relevant Evidence" (1975) 25 McGill Law Journal 3 McGill Law Journal Canada circa 1975 HeinOnline / LexisNexis flag 1
R v Moir (1974) 15 CCC (2d) 305 Canada circa 1974 flag 1
Kilby v R [1973] HCA 30; (1973) 129 CLR 460; 1 ALR 283; 47 ALJR 369 High Court of Australia Australia - Commonwealth 29 Aug 1973 AustLII flag 258
"Implied Assertions and the Scope of the Hearsay Rule" (1973-1974) 9 Melbourne University Law Review 268 Melbourne University Law Review Australia circa 1973 AustLII flag 7
R v Osbourne [1973] QB 678; [1973] 1 All ER 649; 57 Cr App R 297 United Kingdom circa 1973 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 22
R v Hissey (1973) 6 SASR 280 Supreme Court of South Australia Australia - South Australia circa 1973 Legal Online / Westlaw flag 57
Ratten v R [1971] UKPC 23; [1972] AC 378 Privy Council United Kingdom 1 Jul 1971 BAILII flag 164
R v Davey [1970] 2 CCC 351 Canada circa 1970 flag 1
"Periphery of Hearsay, The" (1969-1970) 7 Melbourne University Law Review 1 Melbourne University Law Review Australia circa 1969 AustLII flag 3
"Previous Consistent Statements" [1968] Cambridge Law Journal 64 Cambridge Law Journal United Kingdom circa 1968 flag 2
R v McLean (1967) 52 Cr App R 80 United Kingdom circa 1967 LexisNexis flag 11
Jones v Metcalfe [1967] 3 All ER 205; [1967] 1 WLR 1286 United Kingdom circa 1967 LexisNexis flag 18
Sparks v R [1964] AC 964; [1964] 1 All ER 727; [1964] 2 WLR 566 United Kingdom circa 1964 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 59
R v Doyle [1967] VicRp 82; [1967] VR 698 Australia - Victoria 30 May 1963 AustLII flag 18
"Implied Assertions as Hearsay: Some Criticisms of the Uniform Rules of Evidence" (1962) 14 Stanford Law Review 682 Stanford Law Review United States circa 1962 HeinOnline / LexisNexis flag 3
R v Naidanovici NZCA [1961] NZPoliceLawRp 24; [1962] NZLR 334; (1961) 9 New Zealand Police Law Reports 261 New Zealand Police Law Reports New Zealand 14 Nov 1961 NZLII flag 19
McLellan v Bowyer [1961] HCA 49; (1961) 106 CLR 95; [1962] ALR 243; 35 ALJR 157 High Court of Australia Australia - Commonwealth 11 Aug 1961 AustLII flag 37
Gaio v R [1960] HCA 70; (1960) 104 CLR 419; [1961] ALR 67; (1960) 34 ALJR 266 High Court of Australia Australia - Commonwealth 10 Oct 1960 AustLII flag 47
Nominal Defendant v Clements [1960] HCA 39; (1960) 104 CLR 476; [1960] ALR 701; 34 ALJR 95 High Court of Australia Australia - Commonwealth 28 Jun 1960 AustLII flag 113
People v Gould (1960) 354 P 865 circa 1960 1
Fox v General Medical Council [1960] 3 All ER 225 United Kingdom circa 1960 LexisNexis flag 27
R v Hayden & Slattery [1959] VicRp 18; [1959] VR 102; [1959] ALR 332 Australia - Victoria 26 Sep 1958 AustLII flag 16
Corke v Corke and Cook [1958] 1 All ER 224; [1958] P 93 United Kingdom circa 1958 LexisNexis flag 12
State v Di Vincenti (1957) 93 So2d 676; 232 LA 13 United States circa 1957 flag 2
Subramaniam v Public Prosecutor [1956] UKPC 21; [1956] 1 WLR 965 Privy Council United Kingdom 16 May 1956 BAILII flag 192
"The Scope of the Rule Against Hearsay" (1956) 72 Law Quarterly Review 91 Law Quarterly Review United Kingdom circa 1956 Westlaw flag 6
Marshall v Watt, Struthers & County [1953] TASStRp 2; [1953] Tas SR 1 Australia - Tasmania 2 Apr 1953 AustLII flag 8
Mcgregor v Stokes [1952] VicLawRp 44; [1952] VLR 347 Australia - Victoria 20 Mar 1952 AustLII flag 10
Teper v R [1952] AC 480; [1952] 2 All ER 447 United Kingdom circa 1952 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 97
(1949) 36 NW2d 86 (1949) 36 NW2d 86 United States circa 1949 flag 1
R v Roberts [1942] 1 All ER 187; (1942) 28 Cr App R 102; 58 TLR 138 United Kingdom circa 1942 LexisNexis flag 29
Adelaide Chemical Fertilizer Co Ltd v Carlyle (1940) 64 CLR 515 Australia - Commonwealth circa 1940 Legal Online / Westlaw flag 9
"Res Gesta Reagitata" (1939) 55 Law Quarterly Review 66 Law Quarterly Review United Kingdom circa 1939 Westlaw flag 14
Chandrasekera v R [1937] AC 220 United Kingdom circa 1937 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 7
"Hearsay and Non-Hearsay" (1935) 48 Harvard Law Review 1138 Harvard Law Review United States circa 1935 HeinOnline / LexisNexis flag 5
R v Wysochan (1930) 54 CCC 172 Canada circa 1930 flag 2
"Relation Between Hearsay and Preserved Memory, The" (1927) 40 Harvard Law Review 712 Harvard Law Review United States circa 1927 HeinOnline / LexisNexis flag 8
R v Fannon and Walsh [1922] NSWStRp 36; 39 WN (NSW) 130; (1922) 22 SR (NSW) 427 Supreme Court of New South Wales Australia - New South Wales 4 Jul 1922 AustLII flag 13
Williams v State (1922) 110 SE 286 United States circa 1922 flag 1
Jones v South-Eastern & Chatham Railway Co 's Managing Committee (1918) 87 LJKB 775; (1918) 118 LT 802 King's Bench United Kingdom circa 1918 flag 16
R v Christie [1914] AC 545; [1914-15] All ER 63; (1914) 10 Cr App R 141; 111 LT 220 United Kingdom circa 1914 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 266
R v Gibson (1898) 1 QB 314; 18 QBD 537 United Kingdom circa 1898 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 55
Birchall v Bullough [1896] 1 QB 325 United Kingdom circa 1896 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 11
R v Lillyman [1896] 2 QB 167; 18 Cox CC 346; 65 LJMC 195; 40 Sol Jo 584; 60 JP 536; 74 LT 730 United Kingdom circa 1896 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 120
R v Bedingfield (1879) 14 Cox CC 341 United Kingdom circa 1879 flag 34
R v Burke and Kelly (1847) 2 Cox CC 295 United Kingdom circa 1847 flag 3
Wright v Doe dem Sandford Tatham [1837] EngR 853; 112 ER 488; (1837) 7 A & E 313 Queen's Bench United Kingdom circa 1837 CommonLII flag 37
Maugham v Hubbard and Robinson, Assignees of Lancaster, a Bankrupt [1828] EngR 515; 108 ER 948; (1828) 8 B & C 14 Kings Bench United Kingdom circa 1828 CommonLII flag 6
(1825) 2 C & P 196 (1825) 2 C & P 196 circa 1825 3
Burrough v Martin [1809] EngR 253; (1809) 2 Camp 112; 170 ER 1098 United Kingdom circa 1809 CommonLII flag 6
People v Jung Hing 212 NY 393; 106 NE 105 United States - New York flag 3
Vocisano v Vocisano 130 CLR 267; 3 ALR 97; 48 ALJR 157 Australia - Commonwealth Legal Online / Westlaw flag 66
Thompson v State 58 NE2d 112; 223 Ind 39 United States flag 6
Di Carlo v United States 6 F2d 364 United States Westlaw flag 106

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback