The appellant, who appeared before us in person, raised only one point, namely that the court a quo failed to direct that the period which he had spent in custody prior to his conviction be deducted from his sentence. In his judgment
on sentence the learned judge in the court a quo however specifically mentioned that he was bearing in mind that the appellant had been in continuous custody from 14 January 1999
until he was released on bail on 24 April 2002, that is for a period of more than three years. Before passing sentence the learned
judge once again emphasised that he placed considerable weight on the fact that the appellant had been in custody for three years.
The court a quo therefore clearly took this period of incarceration into account in determining an appropriate sentence. There is accordingly no
merit in the appellant's submission in this regard.
The appeal is dismissed.
DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT THIS f?
f6> JULY 2003
.IRk^^G?^.
F.H.
JUDGE OF APPEAL
LORD R.I. SUTHERLAND JUDGE OF APPEAL
SAFLII:
|
Terms of Use
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.saflii.org/bw/cases/BWCA/2003/27.html