![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
Botswana: Court of Appeal |
[Database Search] [Name Search] [Recent Decisions] [Noteup] [Help]
There was also an appeaj. against conviction* There was no merit in the appeal against conviction but this court came to the conclusion that despite the dreadful nature of Ben Kaunda's previous convictions it could not say that the sentence imposed on Ben Kaunda by the Magistrate was manifestly inadequate and reduced his sentence to that imposed by the Magistrate i.e. 4 years imprisonment. Your record of previous convictions is just as bad as that of 3en Kaunda buc Counsel who is appearing for the State has very fairly and appropriately taken up the attitude that it would he v.-rong cc different.:? te between the treatment given to Ben Kaunda and the treatment to be given to you. Consequently your appeal will succeed to the extent that the Magistrate sentence of four yiars will be restored. In the case of Kaunda I recorded a werious warning and the same warning is going to be issued zo you. Unless you mend your ways, however unlikely that may be having regard to your previous record, but I say unless you tr.end your ways and you commit another crime on any sort of seriousness you can expect no mercy from any court and you can take it •*.. oeyond doubt that vou will be sentenced much more severely <• You and your fellow friends are a menace to society and the court -'.'ill ta
ce strong steps to protect society from you.
3.
As we do not consider that in the circumstances the sentence imposed by the Magistrate was manifestly inadequate and in addition because of the sentence imposed on your fellow thief Kaunda and the fair attitude adopted by Counsel for the State, the appeal against sentence is allowed, and the sentence of four years imprisonment imposed by the Magistrate is restored. Otherwise your appeal is dismissed.
SAFLII:
|
Terms of Use
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.saflii.org/bw/cases/BWCA/1981/1.html